Kingsfield
Two products How it works PII Tokenizer Writing
Connect the Judge
Home › Research › Tax › Section 168 MACRS depreciation
Kingsfield · Research · Tax

Which Code section sets the depreciation method and recovery period for tangible business property (MACRS)?

Published 2026-06-23 · U.S. federal law

Section 168 is the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS): it fixes the depreciation method, recovery period, and convention used to compute the deduction for most tangible business property.

The answer

The MACRS computation

26 U.S.C. § 168(a) provides that the depreciation deduction for tangible property is determined by using the applicable depreciation method, the applicable recovery period, and the applicable convention. Sections 168(b), (c), and (e) then supply those inputs, including the 200-percent declining balance method and the property-class recovery periods.

Method versus general allowance

Section 167 grants the general depreciation allowance as a reasonable deduction for exhaustion and wear and tear, but for property placed in service after 1986 the actual method, period, and convention come from the MACRS rules in Section 168.

The judged input

What the AI drafted

Submitted to the judge

This is an excerpt from a draft tax compliance memo — the kind of work product a lawyer generates with a legal-AI drafting tool, then has to stand behind. Kingsfield does not write it; it rules on the citations the model put in it. This draft cites two authorities; one of them is wrong.

AI draft excerpt — tax compliance memo
The Company placed new manufacturing equipment in service this year and must compute its annual depreciation deduction. Under 26 U.S.C. § 168(a), the deduction for tangible property is determined using the applicable depreciation method, the applicable recovery period, and the applicable convention prescribed by the modified accelerated cost recovery system. The specific recovery periods and the 200-percent declining balance method that govern this equipment are set by 26 U.S.C. § 167. We advise classifying the equipment to its correct MACRS property class before filing.

The judge ruled on every citation as the draft used it — it accepted 26 U.S.C. § 168(a) and rejected 26 U.S.C. § 167. Here is why.

The verdict

How Kingsfield ruled

Ruled 2026-06-23

Each citation in the draft above was submitted to the Kingsfield judge and ruled against the primary-law corpus — Accept, Reject, or Inconclusive, per citation. These are live verdicts, not editorial. Each card shows the claim the draft made and the verbatim authority the verdict was rendered against.

Accept26 U.S.C. § 168(a)

The draft claimed: The depreciation deduction for any tangible property is determined by using the applicable depreciation method, the applicable recovery period, and the applicable convention.

“§ 168(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the depreciation deduction provided by section 167(a) for any tangible property shall be determined by using—”

Cite found; proposition supported by the cited text.

Reject26 U.S.C. § 167

The draft claimed: Section 167 is the provision that prescribes the specific MACRS recovery periods and the 200-percent declining balance depreciation method for tangible property placed in service.

Cite found, but the cited text does not support the claim. 26 U.S.C. 167 grants only the general allowance for a reasonable depreciation deduction; the specific MACRS method, recovery period, and convention are prescribed by 26 U.S.C. 168. Regenerate with the correct authority.

Run your own work through the judge

Kingsfield rules on every citation, quote, and proposition your AI produces, against the primary law we cover. Accept, Reject, or Inconclusive, per citation, with a signed Audit Capsule.

Connect the Judge See the architecture

This page is legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The draft shown is an illustration of a typical AI answer; verdicts reflect the cited authority in the Kingsfield corpus as of the ruling date shown above.

Kingsfield

The judge for legal AI.
A WalkerNash Development LLC product.

© 2026 WalkerNash Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Built in the United States. No third-party trackers.
Product
  • Two products
  • How it works
  • Audit Capsule
  • Practice areas
  • Cloud Judge · MCP
  • PII Tokenizer
For Firms
  • Pricing
  • Privilege
  • DPA
  • Trust posture
  • Research
  • Verified attorneys
  • Status
Company
  • About WalkerNash
  • Crucible (compliance)
  • Writing
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Press
v0.9.4 · 2026.05.26kingsfield.ai