Is it illegal to break a cash deposit into smaller amounts to stay under the currency reporting threshold?
Section 5324 makes it unlawful to structure a transaction with a financial institution for the purpose of evading the currency-transaction reporting requirements, even if no single transaction would otherwise trigger a report.
The answer
The prohibition
31 U.S.C. § 5324 bars any person, for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of section 5313 (or its regulations), from structuring, assisting in structuring, or attempting to structure any transaction with one or more domestic financial institutions.
Why intent matters
The offense turns on purpose. The conduct is splitting or arranging deposits so each falls below the reporting threshold, done with the specific aim of evading the report a financial institution would otherwise file.
The judged input
What the AI drafted
Submitted to the judgeThis is an excerpt from a draft BSA/AML compliance memo — the kind of work product a lawyer generates with a legal-AI drafting tool, then has to stand behind. Kingsfield does not write it; it rules on the citations the model put in it. This draft cites two authorities; one of them is wrong.
The judge ruled on every citation as the draft used it — it accepted 31 U.S.C. § 5324 and rejected 31 U.S.C. § 5313. Here is why.
The verdict
How Kingsfield ruled
Ruled 2026-06-23Each citation in the draft above was submitted to the Kingsfield judge and ruled against the primary-law corpus — Accept, Reject, or Inconclusive, per citation. These are live verdicts, not editorial. Each card shows the claim the draft made and the verbatim authority the verdict was rendered against.
The draft claimed: No person shall, for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of section 5313 or its regulations, structure, assist in structuring, or attempt to structure any transaction with one or more domestic financial institutions.
“§ 5324 No person shall, for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of section 5313(a) or 5325 or any regulation prescribed under any such section, the reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed by any order issued under section 5326, or the recordkeeping requirements imposed by any regulation prescribed under section 21 of the Federal…”
Cite found; proposition supported by the cited text.
The draft claimed: Section 5313 prohibits breaking cash deposits into smaller amounts for the purpose of evading the currency-transaction report, making structuring a crime.
Cite found, but the cited text does not support the claim. 31 U.S.C. 5313 imposes the affirmative duty on financial institutions to file currency transaction reports for transactions over the threshold; the anti-structuring prohibition is at 31 U.S.C. 5324. Regenerate with the correct authority.
Run your own work through the judge
Kingsfield rules on every citation, quote, and proposition your AI produces, against the primary law we cover. Accept, Reject, or Inconclusive, per citation, with a signed Audit Capsule.
Connect the Judge See the architectureThis page is legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The draft shown is an illustration of a typical AI answer; verdicts reflect the cited authority in the Kingsfield corpus as of the ruling date shown above.